EC-Council Certified Incident Handler

This morning I sat for EC-Council's Certified Incident Handler and wanted to share some thoughts.  First, like everything I've done so far from EC-Council, they appear to cling to relevancy in their courses, shotgun blasting everything in existence at their programs. 

But, like my previous experiences with EC-Council, their material provides outdated references and information throughout the course of study.  A simple search of many of the tools referenced in the coursework reveal deprecated software, software that is lacking relevant updates, or tools that have simply vanished from existence.  For a course that was supposedly updated this year, it appears that much of their information shouldn't have met muster.

Beyond this, the information itself is really just a conglomeration of resources from elsewhere, with EC-Council writing the processes off as their own.  There is no need to reinvent the wheel here, as organizations like NIST have provided this information for everyone, and it requires no certification to understand and use. 

I've tried to come up with something positive about this course, and, at best, it serves as a refresher for previous courses and certifications, primarily CompTIA's Security+, or ISC2's SSCP.

So unfortunately, this course was required as part of the Bachelor's program I am attending.  It isn't something I would recommend to anyone that wants an Incident Handler course that is relevant.  There is no practical examination or hands on experience whatsoever, and it's the regular EC-Council broken English references and exam questions we've grown to hate.

EC-Council's Certified Incident Handler course is currently v.2, 100 questions, and requires 70 correct responses to pass.


pjlvx0jvj7 said…
However, many roulette tables have an indication that shows the final 20 or so numbers, so there’s no must do it yourself. The caveat right here is that want to|you should|you have to} play at legitimate casinos. Those casinos use random quantity 메리트카지노 turbines discover out} what quantity the ball lands in, and people RNGs are tested by firms to prove that the results are truthful and random. In other words, when you had been half in} American roulette and positioned a $1 on each quantity (1-36, zero, 00) you’d win $35 plus your $1 unique bet for $36 total. However, being as there is be} 38 numbers you’d of wagered $38 for a $2 loss. Most people are content material with half in} roulette with small-to-medium stakes, however some folks with more cash than most favor the thrill of half in} with a lot greater stakes.

Popular Posts